I don’t see much point in talking about battery life, since there are practically no differences under load, and during normal work, on average, you will be able to survive a maximum of an hour, which Apple promises, but most likely less. Basically, there is an increase, but it is not always obvious. So whether you notice this 20-30% difference or not will solely depend on the software you use, the tasks you perform, and their complexity. Perhaps if it’s more difficult to produce content with some incredible effects or amazing color grading, then the difference will certainly be more noticeable. The difference is almost 1.5 minutes and 22%.īut when editing videos in Final Cut, there is no difference at all between chips of different generations! The M2 Max chip completed the render in 5 minutes and 10 seconds, while the M1 Max took 6 minutes and 35 seconds. While the M1 Max has a maximum temperature of 96 degrees for productive cores and about 85 degrees for efficient ones.īut there is also a difference in the test results. When rendering in Blender, the temperature of the M2 Max’s performance cores reached 102 degrees at the peak, and the effective cores reached about 97 degrees. In 3DMark Wild Life Extreme, the M1 Max laptop achieved an average frame rate of 119, while the M2 Max averaged 150fps, an almost 20% increase.īy temperature. According to Apple’s promises, a performance increase of up to 30%, but in the Metal test, the difference was 16%. The graphics in Geekbench 6 turned out to be interesting: 38 GPU cores versus 32 in the M1 Max.

Game for macbook pro